{"id":3073,"date":"2015-04-01T23:52:13","date_gmt":"2015-04-02T06:52:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/?p=3073"},"modified":"2015-04-01T23:52:13","modified_gmt":"2015-04-02T06:52:13","slug":"rfc-7514-really-explicit-congestion-notification-recn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/2015\/04\/01\/rfc-7514-really-explicit-congestion-notification-recn\/","title":{"rendered":"RFC 7514 : Really Explicit Congestion Notification (RECN)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I feel that somewhere up there Jon Postel is smiling about Matthew&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rfc-editor.org\/rfc\/rfc7514.txt\">RFC 7514<\/a>, published today:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The deployment of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) [RFC3168] remains stalled.  While most operating systems support ECN, it is currently disabled by default because of fears that enabling ECN will break transport protocols.  This document proposes a new ICMP message that a router or host may use to advise a host to reduce the rate at which it sends, in cases where the host ignores other signals such as packet loss and ECN.  We call this message the &#8220;Really Explicit Congestion Notification&#8221; (RECN) message because it delivers a less subtle indication of congestion than packet loss and ECN.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rfc-editor.org\/rfc\/rfc7514.txt\">http:\/\/www.rfc-editor.org\/rfc\/rfc7514.txt<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I feel that somewhere up there Jon Postel is smiling about Matthew&#8217;s RFC 7514, published today: The deployment of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) [RFC3168] remains stalled. While most operating systems support ECN, it is currently disabled by default because of fears that enabling ECN will break transport protocols. This document proposes a new ICMP message [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1,8,19,4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[26],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3073"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3073"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3073\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3081,"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3073\/revisions\/3081"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3073"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3073"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3073"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.caida.org\/best_available_data\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=3073"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}